原帖由 haliluya_2007 于 2008-5-15 13:44 发表
最好的工具其实就是你的大脑,无聊的时候随便思考点这些方面的问题,自然就积少成多了。
记得以前有一个晚上卢瑟福(发现原子核式结构,诺贝尔奖获得者)发现实验室的灯还亮着,就走进去看。一个学生还在做实验,他 ...
原帖由 haliluya_2007 于 2008-5-15 22:38 发表
其实这些关键都不在笔,只要顺手有心,用什么笔都是次要的。我一边走路一边计算用的笔都是1元钱一支的中性笔,上次从家里走到外婆家花了1~2个小时,复习了一下薛定谔方程。
若是each of the writting tools则可以用have
Again, we have to distinguish the Surface Structure, how something is said, from the Deep Structure, what it means.
The interesting sentence for me is:
The storm felled the tree.
On the Surface Structure level of English, the noun storm is the subject of the sentence. Yet, it can't be the Agent because it is not animate; rather, it's that "unvolitional" inanimate "force" that you described in your definition of the Instrument.
Dr. JCS: Exactly! Take another sentence:
Guns kill people.
The noun guns is the subject on the Surface Structure level. But on the Deep Structure level the noun guns is the Instrument which carries out the action "to kill."
绝大部份gerunds都是uncountable
不过Collins Cobuild说有一小部分是countable
比如说meeting,setting,turning,warning
我发现字典里面
它们都是自己main entry
另外uncountable gerunds
都是在infinitive下面
原帖由 56式步枪 于 2008-6-2 23:01 发表
Pens can write完全没有问题
就象Guns can kill
或者It is safe to eat
不会说It is safe to be eaten
英文有很多exceptions
What I said is just kidding 没有问题
"What I said"本身是一个noun
kidding是 ...
原帖由 苍穹一鹤 于 2008-6-2 21:51 发表
严重的语法错误
1 each在此修饰单数名词writting tool 其后跟谓语动词应该是has 而不是have 若是each of the writting tools则可以用have
2 What I said is just kidding 这句话是什么意思呢?“我刚才说的话 ...
欢迎光临 钢笔论坛 (http://penbbs.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.2 |